Supreme Court of the United States
Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance
This writing
- Type
- Dissent
- Filed
- June 15, 2006
- Case
- Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice KENNEDY, with whom Justice SOUTER and Justice ALITO join, dissenting. The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that payments for workers’ compensation coverage are “contributions to an employee benefit plan ... arising from services rendered.” 11 U.S.C.A. § 507(a)(5) (Supp.2006). In reversing that judgment the Court’s opinion relies on the premise that “statutorily pre…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | June 15, 2006 |