Supreme Court of the United States
Hudson v. Michigan
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- June 15, 2006
- Case
- Hudson v. Michigan
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Kennedy, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Two points should be underscored with respect to today’s decision. First, the knoek-and-announce requirement protects rights and expectations linked to ancient principles in our constitutional order. See Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U. S. 927, 934 (1995). The Court’s decision should not be interpreted as suggesting that violatio…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Antonin Scalia | June 15, 2006 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | June 15, 2006 |
| Dissent | Not attributed | June 15, 2006 |