Supreme Court of the United States
Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- June 15, 2006
- Case
- Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Scalia, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. I join the judgment of the Court, and Parts I, III, and IV of the Court’s opinion; I do not join Part II for the reasons set forth below. The District Court ordered these cases remanded to state court for want of jurisdiction. We know this because the orders say so: “Because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | David Hackett Souter | June 15, 2006 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | June 15, 2006 |