Supreme Court of the United States
Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence in part
- Filed
- June 5, 2006
- Case
- Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Breyer, concurring in part and dissenting in part. In my view, the civil damages remedy in the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U. S. C. §§ 1961-1968 (2000 ed. and Supp. Ill), does not cover claims of injury by one competitor where the legitimate procompetitive activity of another competitor immediately causes that injury. I believe that this…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | June 5, 2006 |
| Opinion | Anthony McLeod Kennedy | June 5, 2006 |
| Concurrence | Not attributed | June 5, 2006 |