Supreme Court of the United States
Brigham City v. Stuart
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- May 22, 2006
- Case
- Brigham City v. Stuart
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Stevens, concurring. This is an odd flyspeck of a case. The charges that have been pending against respondents for the past six years are minor offenses — intoxication, contributing to the delinquency of a minor, and disorderly conduct — two of which could have been proved by evidence that was gathered by the responding officers before they entered the home. The maximum punishment for these crimes ra…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | John G. Roberts Jr. | May 22, 2006 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | May 22, 2006 |