United States v. Wall

Type

Opinion of the Court

Per curiam

Yes — no individual author

Filed

June 18, 2002

Case

United States v. Wall

Case status

Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED. Defendant Frederick Wall timely appeals from a judgment of conviction entered by the District Court on July 27, 2001. On December 11, 2000, Wall pleaded guilty pursuant to a written plea agreement with the Government to one count of conspiracy to commit mail, wire, and securities fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 , based on a scheme to defraud purchasers of alleged private placement stock. After enumerating the relevant sentencing calculations for Wall’s crime, the plea agreement concluded that “the defendant’s stipulated [S]entencing Guidelines range is 24 to 30 months,” Plea Agreem. of Frederick Wall at 2. Wall was principally sentenced to thirty months of imprisonment. Wall contends that his sentence should be vacated and that the case should be remanded to a different district court judge for resentencing, because (1) the Government violated its plea agreement with Wall by filing a motion to deny Wall a two-point reduction in his offense level for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a); and (2) the District Co…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.