U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
United States v. Huggins
This writing
- Type
- Opinion of the Court
- Per curiam
- Yes — no individual author
- Filed
- June 18, 2002
- Case
- United States v. Huggins
- Case status
- Decided
Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
PER CURIAM. Alvin Justin Huggins seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Huggins, Nos. CR-95-51-H; CA-01-70-4-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con *651 tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED.…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.