U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Lawson v. Commonwealth
This writing
- Type
- Opinion of the Court
- Per curiam
- Yes — no individual author
- Filed
- June 17, 2002
- Case
- Lawson v. Commonwealth
- Case status
- Decided
Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
PER CURIAM. Joseph Dwight Lawson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lawson v. Virginia, No. CA-01-180-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Mar. 22, 2002 entered Mar. 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.