U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Sewald v. Pyatt & Silvestri, Chtd.
This writing
- Type
- Opinion of the Court
- Filed
- June 13, 2002
- Case
- Sewald v. Pyatt & Silvestri, Chtd.
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
MEMORANDUM *** John Russell Sewald appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his action against defendant Pyatt and Silvestri alleging tortious interference with his attempts to discover who sent a piece of certified mail to defendant law firm. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo and affirm the district court’s dismissal of Sewald’s action for failure to state a claim. See Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir.1988). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. . The United States Postal Service’s motion for summary affirmance was granted on November 8, 2001.…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.