U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Hackler v. North Carolina
This writing
- Type
- Opinion of the Court
- Per curiam
- Yes — no individual author
- Filed
- June 6, 2002
- Case
- Hackler v. North Carolina
- Case status
- Decided
Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
PER CURIAM. Thomas M. Hackler appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. See Hackler v. North Carolina, Nos. CA-02-20-MU-1-2 CA-02-23-1-2-MU (W.D.N.C., filed Jan. 31, 2002; entered Feb. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.