U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Favish v. Office of Independent Counsel
This writing
- Type
- Dissent
- Author
- Harry Pregerson
- Filed
- June 6, 2002
- Case
- Favish v. Office of Independent Counsel
- Case status
- Decided
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I continue to maintain that the record before the district court before remand was “sufficiently detailed for the district court to resolve the issues in this case” without an in camera review of the ten photographs at issue. Favish v. OIC, 217 F.3d 1168, 1186 (9th Cir.2000). Nevertheless, having personally viewed the ten photographs, I adhere to my prior conclusion that only the photograph of Foster’s right hand clutching the gun should be released because “[t]he public’s interest in disclosure of the remaining nine, never-before-released post-mortem Polaroid photographs does not outweigh the privacy interests of Vincent Foster’s surviving family in their nondisclosure.” Id.…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | June 6, 2002 |