United States v. Begleiter

Type

Opinion of the Court

Per curiam

Yes — no individual author

Filed

April 17, 2002

Case

United States v. Begleiter

Case status

Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this order. Defendant-appellant Robert Begleiter appeals from the August 22, 2001 judgment of the district court finding Begleiter guilty, following his guilty plea, of one count of credit card fraud committed while Begleiter was on bail, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1029 (a)(5) and 3147(1). Be-gleiter was sentenced principally to thirty-seven months’ imprisonment, criminal forfeiture in the amount of $160,000, and restitution in the amount of $81,581.59. After his third arrest for credit card fraud, Begleiter signed a plea agreement in which he agreed, among other things, to *81 waive indictment and plead guilty to one count of credit card fraud committed while on bail. The second paragraph of the plea agreement states that the United States Attorney’s Office (“Office” or “government”) “estimates the likely adjusted offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines to be level 15,” based in part on a seven-level enhancement for a loss of over $120,000 in c…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.