U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
United States v. Nickens
This writing
- Type
- Opinion of the Court
- Author
- Dolores Korman Sloviter
- Filed
- April 12, 2002
- Case
- United States v. Nickens
- Case status
- Decided
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. Appellant Frank Richard Nickens was charged in a sixty-seven count indictment with wire fraud involving the use of the Internet in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 1343. Nickens pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement and now challenges a two level increase in his guideline computation based on the determination that the offense was committed through “mass-marketing,” as set forth in U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1(b)(3). Following the recommendation of the presentence report, the District Court applied a two level increase, determining that the offense was committed through “mass-marketing” pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1(b)(3). The commentary defines “mass-marketing” as follows: a plan, program, promotion, or campaign that is conducted through solicitation by telephone, mail, the Internet, or other means to induce a large number of persons to (A) purchase goods or services;.... The enhancement would apply, for example, if the defendant conducted or participated in a telemarketing campaign that solicited a large number of individuals to purchase fraudulent life insurance policies. U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1, cmt. n. 3 (2000). According to the presentence report, wh…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.