U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
John Rezzonico v. H & R Block, Inc.
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Author
- Richard J. Cardamone
- Filed
- June 29, 1999
- Case
- John Rezzonico v. H & R Block, Inc.
- Case status
- Decided
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
182 F.3d 144 (2nd Cir. 1999) JOHN REZZONICO and JACQUELYN REZZONICO, Defendant-Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant, v. H R BLOCK, INC. and H R BLOCK EASTERN TAX SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Appellee, HRB ROYALTY, INC., Add as party from consolidated case, Plaintiff. Docket No. 98-7060 August Term, 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT. Argued November 6, 1998. Decided June 29, 1999. Plaintiffs John and Jacquelyn Rezzonico appeal from a judgment entered November 26, 1997 in the United States District Court for the District of Vermont (Murtha, C.J.), granting H R Block, Inc., H R Block Eastern Tax Services, Inc., and HRB Royalty, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment. Dismissed.[Copyrighted Material Omitted] NORMAN A. OLCH, New York, New York, for Appellants. PETER J. KLARFELD, Wiley, Rein Fielding, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Before: KEARSE, CARDAMONE, and POOLER, Circuit Judges CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge: 1 We must decide two preliminary questions that will determine whether we reach the merits of this appeal: first, whether we may properly reconsider a decision of a motions panel denying defendant's motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of …
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.