U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4324, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7041 Donald C. Erickson v. Newmar Corporation, Does I Through X and Doe Corporations I Through X, Inclusive
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Author
- Warren John Ferguson
- Filed
- June 18, 1996
- Case
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4324, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7041 Donald C. Erickson v. Newmar Corporation, Does I Through X and Doe Corporations I Through X, Inclusive
- Case status
- Decided
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
87 F.3d 298 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4324 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7041 Donald C. ERICKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEWMAR CORPORATION, Does I through X and Doe Corporations I through X, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15726. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 20, 1995. Decided June 18, 1996. Donald C. Erickson, Moapa, Nevada, in pro. per., for plaintiff-appellant. E. Leslie Combs, Jr., Combs England, Las Vegas, Nevada, for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-91-00968. Before: FERGUSON and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and NIELSEN, District Judge. * FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: 1 Pro se plaintiff, Donald Erickson, brought suit against Newmar Corporation, claiming that his motor home, which was manufactured by the defendant, was defective. Erickson alleged violations of the Consumer Product Warranty Act 1 and supplemental state law claims including breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, fraud, negligence, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. After a bench trial, the district court ruled in favo…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.