U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Roland Spruill v. Merit Systems Protection Board
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Filed
- Dec. 21, 1992
- Case
- Roland Spruill v. Merit Systems Protection Board
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
978 F.2d 679 Roland SPRUILL, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. No. 91-3245. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Oct. 22, 1992. Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined Dec. 21, 1992. Charles A. Hobbie, Deputy Gen. Counsel, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Washington, D.C., argued, for petitioner. With him on the brief, was Mark D. Roth, Gen. Counsel. Also on the brief, was Daniel Minahan, Minahan Shapiro, P.C., Lakewood, Colo. Of counsel was Alexia McCashill. David C. Kane, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Bd., Washington, D.C., argued, for respondent. With him on the brief, were Mary L. Jennings, Acting Gen. Counsel and Rita S. Arendal, Atty. Deborah Bynum, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Of counsel were Martha H. DeGraff and David M. Cohen, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. Before PLAGER, Circuit Judge, SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge. PLAGER, Circuit Judge. 1 Roland Spruill (Spruill), an employee of the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), was given a three-day suspension by the agency. He petitioned the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or Boa…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.