U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
National Labor Relations Board v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, National Labor Relations Board Union 6, Intervenor. Department of the Air Force, Sacramento Air Logistics Center, McClellan Air Force Base, California v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio, Local 1857, Intervenor. National Park Service, National Capital Region, United States Park Service v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Police Association of the District of Columbia, Intervenor
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Author
- Harry Thomas Edwards
- Filed
- March 6, 1992
- Case
- National Labor Relations Board v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, National Labor Relations Board Union 6, Intervenor. Department of the Air Force, Sacramento Air Logistics Center, McClellan Air Force Base, California v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio, Local 1857, Intervenor. National Park Service, National Capital Region, United States Park Service v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Police Association of the District of Columbia, Intervenor
- Case status
- Decided
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
952 F.2d 523 139 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2185 , 293 U.S.App.D.C. 167, 60 USLW 2496 , 120 Lab.Cas. P 11,057 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent, National Labor Relations Board Union 6, Intervenor. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, SACRAMENTO AIR LOGISTICS CENTER, McCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 1857, Intervenor. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION, UNITED STATES PARK SERVICE, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent, Police Association of the District of Columbia, Intervenor. Nos. 91-1044, 91-1070 and 91-1087. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Nov. 8, 1991. Decided Jan. 7, 1992. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied March 6, 1992. Petitions for Review of Orders of the Federal Labor Relations Authority. Marc Richman, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, with whom Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., and William Kanter, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in all cases. Richard Zorn, Atty., Federal Labor Relations…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.