Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Opinion
Author
Bobby Ray Baldock
Filed
Aug. 1, 1991
Case
Harry Robinson and Kay Robinson, Eva May McCarthy and George Samuel Robinson v. Volkswagenwerk Ag, Greer & Greer, and Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C.
Case status
Decided

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

940 F.2d 1369 Harry ROBINSON and Kay Robinson, Eva May McCarthy and George Samuel Robinson, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. VOLKSWAGENWERK AG, Defendant, Greer Greer, Defendant-Appellee, and Herzfeld Rubin, P.C., Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-5082. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Aug. 1, 1991. Herbert Rubin (and Daniel V. Gsovski, Herzfeld Rubin, New York City, Richard M. Eldridge John F. Tucker, Rhodes, Hieronymous, Jones, Tucker Gable, Tulsa, Okl., with him on the brief), for defendant-appellant. Thomas Elke, Palo Alto, Cal. (Ronald D. Mercaldo Lucille D. Sherman, Law Offices of Ronald D. Mercaldo, Ltd., Winton D. Woods, Tucson, Ariz., Maynard I. Ungerman, Ungerman Iola, Tulsa, Okl., with him, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellees. Jack Redhair (and Nancy Coomer, Chandler, Tullar, Udall Redhair, Tucson, Ariz., with him on the brief), for defendant-appellee. Before TACHA and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges, and KANE, District Judge. * BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. 1 Defendant-appellant Herzfeld Rubin, P.C. (H R) appeals from an interlocutory order of the district court denying a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment filed by itself and defendant Volkswagenwerk AG (VWAG). S…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Read the full document (court PDF)