U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Fern v. United States
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Author
- Helen Wilson Nies
- Filed
- July 16, 1990
- Case
- Fern v. United States
- Case status
- Decided
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
908 F.2d 955 59 USLW 2119 , 12 Employee Benefits Ca 1936 Albert John FERN, Jr., John T. Flannagan, Robert Jeffrey, Donnald Koppenhaver, James H. Powell, Robert Louis Stirm, Max E. Thompson, Jack Trahan and David E. Walentowski, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 89-1106. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. July 16, 1990. Mattaniah Eytan, Kaplan, Russin, Vecchi Eytan, of San Francisco, Cal., argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Martha H. DeGraff, Dept. of Justice, of Washington, D.C., argued for defendant-appellee. John R. Bolton, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Mary Mitchelson, Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, of Washington, D.C., were on the brief for defendant-appellee. Also on the brief was Ralph E. Avery, Office of the Judge Advocate General, Dept. of the Army, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Before NIES, Chief Judge * , NEWMAN and ARCHER, Circuit Judges. NIES, Chief Judge. 1 This appeal is from the final judgment of the United States Claims Court, Fern v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 580 (1988) (Lydon, J.), dismissing a complaint which sought just compensation under the Fifth Amendment to t…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.