Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Opinion
Author
Robert Heron Bork
Filed
April 7, 1987
Case
Maxcell Telecom Plus, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Yankee Celltell Co., Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Bellsouth Mobility Inc., Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Nynex Mobile Communications Co., Radiofone, Inc., Centel Corporation, MCI Cellular Telephone Company, New Vector Communications, Inc., Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., Baldwin Telecom, Inc., Contel Cellular Inc., Intervenors. Northwestern Indiana Telephone Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Yankee Celltell Co., Bellsouth Mobility Inc., Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Nynex Mobile Communications Co., Radiofone, Inc., Centel Corporation, MCI Cellular Telephone Company, Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., Continental Telecom, Inc., Baldwin Telecom, Inc., Intervenors. Maxcell Telecom Plus, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, St. Louis Cellular System, Inc., New Orleans Cgsa, Inc., Centel Corporation, Yankee Celltell, Co., Newvector Communications, Inc., Continental Telecom, Inc., Intervenors. La Star Cellular Telephone Company v. Federal Communications Commission, New Orleans Cgsa, Inc., Contel Cellular, Inc., Intervenors. Northwestern Indiana Telephone Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, New Orleans Cgsa, Inc., Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., Contel Cellular Inc., Intervenors. Harry J. Pappas D/B/A California Portaphone v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Nynex Mobile Communications Co., Bellsouth Mobility Inc., MCI Cellular Telephone Company, Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., Continental Telecom, Inc., Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Intervenors
Case status
Decided

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

815 F.2d 1551 259 U.S.App.D.C. 350 MAXCELL TELECOM PLUS, INC., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents, Yankee Celltell Co., Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., BellSouth Mobility Inc., Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, NYNEX Mobile Communications Co., Radiofone, Inc., Centel Corporation, MCI Cellular Telephone Company, et al., New Vector Communications, Inc., Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., Baldwin Telecom, Inc., Contel Cellular Inc., Intervenors. NORTHWESTERN INDIANA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents, Yankee Celltell Co., BellSouth Mobility Inc., Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, NYNEX Mobile Communications Co., Radiofone, Inc., Centel Corporation, MCI Cellular Telephone Company, et al., Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., Continental Telecom, Inc., Baldwin Telecom, Inc., Intervenors. MAXCELL TELECOM PLUS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee, St. Louis Cellular System, Inc., New Orleans CGSA, …

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Read the full document (court PDF)