Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Opinion
Author
En Banc
Filed
Aug. 1, 1985
Case
Willard A. Bronger v. Office of Personnel Management, Frank E. Kacprowicz v. Office of Personnel Management, Albert J. Veverka v. Office of Personnel Management
Case status
Decided

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

769 F.2d 756 Willard A. BRONGER, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. Frank E. KACPROWICZ, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. Albert J. VEVERKA, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. Appeal Nos. 83-1349, 83-1350 and 83-1376. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Aug. 1, 1985. Carl H. DeBroux, N. Aurora, Ill., argued for petitioners. Helene M. Goldberg, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Mary Mitchelson and Thomas W. Petersen. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, FRIEDMAN, RICH, DAVIS, BALDWIN, KASHIWA and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, MILLER, * Senior Circuit Judge, and SMITH, NIES, NEWMAN and BISSELL, Circuit Judges. NIES, Circuit Judge. 1 These consolidated appeals are from a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) upholding the denial by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) of petitioner's early retirement claims under 5 U.S.C. Sec. 8336 (e) (1976). The appeals were originally decided by a three-judge panel which, by a two-to-one majority, reversed …

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Read the full document (court PDF)