Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Opinion
Filed
Jan. 24, 1975
Case
9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 180, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9907 Dolores Marie Meadows, Cross-Appellee v. Ford Motor Company, Cross-Appellant, Local 862, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agriculturalimplement Workers of America, and International Union, United Automobile,aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America
Case status
Decided

Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

510 F.2d 939 9 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 180 , 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9907 Dolores Marie MEADOWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, Local 862, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and AgriculturalImplement Workers of America, and International Union, United Automobile,Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 74--1258 and 74--1259. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Jan. 24, 1975. James C. Hickey, Ewen, MacKenzie Peden, Louisville, Ky., Thomas L. Hogan, Louisville, Ky., for plaintiff-appellant, cross-appellee. Arthur W. Grafton, Edgar A. Zingman, Sheryl G. Snyder, Jon L. Fleischaker, Louisville, Ky., Herbert L. Segal, Irwin H. lCutler, Jr., Louisville, Ky., for defendant-appellee, cross-appellant. Mary-Helen Mautner, EEOC, Washington, D.C. (William A. Carey, Gen. Counsel, Joseph Beatrice Rosenberg, Gen. Counsel, Beatrice Rosenberg, Charles L. Reischel, EEOC, on brief) for amicus curiae. Before EDWARDS and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge. 1 Plaintiff appeals from the denial of back pay and retroactive seniority…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Read the full document (court PDF)