U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
United States v. Bryan Puckett
This writing
- Type
- Dissent
- Filed
- Aug. 5, 2019
- Case
- United States v. Bryan Puckett
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
SILER, Circuit Judge, dissenting. As seen from the majority opinion, very few cases have discussed this dilemma. It would have been easy for the prosecution to have charged the defendant with mail or wire fraud before the statute of limitations expired, but it was not effected for some reason. Now, we must decide whether the conduct by defendants amounted to a violation of the bank fraud statute. I think it did and I would affirm t…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Lead opinion | Not attributed | Aug. 5, 2019 |
| Opinion | Raymond M. Kethledge | Aug. 5, 2019 |
| Concurrence | Not attributed | Aug. 5, 2019 |