Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Concurrence
Filed
Aug. 5, 2019
Case
United States v. Bryan Puckett
Case status
Decided

Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

OLIVER, District Judge, Concurring. I agree with the majority that the following arguments made by the Government are clearly not well taken: (1) that the jury could infer that the banks were defrauded on evidence that the mortgage companies were wholly-owned subsidiaries of FDIC-insured banks; (2) that the jury could infer that the mortgage companies' funds were under the custody or control of the parent banks, because the mor…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Other writings in this case

TypeAuthorFiled
Lead opinion Not attributed Aug. 5, 2019
Opinion Raymond M. Kethledge Aug. 5, 2019
Dissent Not attributed Aug. 5, 2019