U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
United States v. Steven Vincent Smith
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence in part
- Filed
- Aug. 28, 2019
- Case
- United States v. Steven Vincent Smith
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part:1 As the majority points out, we are far from the first court to consider whether the NIT warrant passes constitutional muster. I agree with the majority that it does not. The majority also adds its voice to the unanimous chorus of ten other courts of appeals who have found that, regardless of any constit…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | Aug. 28, 2019 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | Aug. 28, 2019 |