U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
United States v. Steven Vincent Smith
This writing
- Type
- Opinion of the Court
- Filed
- Aug. 28, 2019
- Case
- United States v. Steven Vincent Smith
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
NEWSOM, Circuit Judge: James Taylor and Steven Smith are the latest in a long line of child-pornography consumers to argue that the evidence of their crimes should be suppressed because the warrant that led to its discovery-issued by a magistrate judge in the Eastern District of Virginia but purporting to authorize a nationwide, remote-access computer search-violated the Fourth Amendment. By our count, we become today the eleventh…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | Aug. 28, 2019 |
| Concurrence in part | Not attributed | Aug. 28, 2019 |