Supreme Court of the United States
Cone v. Bell
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- April 28, 2009
- Case
- Cone v. Bell
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Chief Justice Roberts, concurring in the judgment. The Court’s decision is grounded in unusual facts that necessarily limit its reach. When issues under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 (1963), are presented on federal habeas, they usually have been previously addressed in state proceedings. Federal review is accordingly sharply limited by established principles of deference: If the claim ha…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | April 28, 2009 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | April 28, 2009 |
| Concurrence in part | Not attributed | April 28, 2009 |