Supreme Court of the United States
Cone v. Bell
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence in part
- Filed
- April 28, 2009
- Case
- Cone v. Bell
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Alito, concurring in part and dissenting in part. We granted certiorari in this case to answer two questions: “1. Is a federal habeas claim ‘procedurally defaulted’ because it has been presented twice to the state courts? “2. Is a federal habeas court powerless to recognize that a state court erred in holdi…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | April 28, 2009 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | April 28, 2009 |
| Concurrence | Not attributed | April 28, 2009 |