Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Concurrence in part
Filed
April 28, 2009
Case
Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
Case status
Decided

Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

Justice Kennedy, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. I join Parts I, II, III-A through III-D, and IV of the opinion of the Court and agree that the judgment must be reversed. This separate writing is to underscore certain background principles for the conclusion that an agency’s decision to change course may be arbitrary and capricious if the agency sets a new cou…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Other writings in this case

TypeAuthorFiled
Opinion Not attributed April 28, 2009
Opinion of the Court Not attributed April 28, 2009
Concurrence Not attributed April 28, 2009
Dissent Not attributed April 28, 2009