Supreme Court of the United States
Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- April 28, 2009
- Case
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Thomas, concurring. I join the Court’s opinion, which, as a matter of administrative law, correctly upholds the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) policy with respect to indecent broadcast speech under the Administrative Procedure Act. I write separately, however, to note the questionable viability of the two precedents that support the FCC’s assertion of constitutional authority to regulate t…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | April 28, 2009 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | April 28, 2009 |
| Concurrence in part | Not attributed | April 28, 2009 |
| Dissent | Not attributed | April 28, 2009 |