Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Dissent
Filed
Feb. 24, 2009
Case
Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Ass'n
Case status
Decided

Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

Justice Souter, dissenting. If I thought this case should be classified solely as one about the First Amendment’s limits on a State’s management of its own affairs, I would join the judgment, and as it is I agree with much of the Court’s opinion. So far as Idaho’s *376law affects freedom of expression, I am not persuaded there is sufficient reason to tre…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Other writings in this case

TypeAuthorFiled
Opinion of the Court Not attributed Feb. 24, 2009
Opinion Not attributed Feb. 24, 2009
Concurrence Not attributed Feb. 24, 2009
Concurrence in part Not attributed Feb. 24, 2009