Supreme Court of the United States
Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Ass'n
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- Feb. 24, 2009
- Case
- Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Ass'n
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Ginsburg, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. The classification question this case presents can be answered without extended discussion. The parties agree here, as they did in the Court of Appeals, that Idaho’s ban on payroll deductions for political activities violates First Amendment limitations as applied to the private sector. They also agree here, as they did before the Ninth Ci…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | Feb. 24, 2009 |
| Opinion | Not attributed | Feb. 24, 2009 |
| Concurrence in part | Not attributed | Feb. 24, 2009 |
| Dissent | Not attributed | Feb. 24, 2009 |