U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Eusebio Bernard v. United States of America, Eusebio Bernard v. James Clifford, Brian Fitzpatrick, a Certain Unidentified Confidential Informant, and Unidentified Agents, Officers, Employees and Servants of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Designated "John and Jane Doe Numbered: 1 Through 5," Jointly and Severally, All Such Being Employees of the Drug Enforcement Administration.
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Filed
- May 25, 1994
- Case
- Eusebio Bernard v. United States of America, Eusebio Bernard v. James Clifford, Brian Fitzpatrick, a Certain Unidentified Confidential Informant, and Unidentified Agents, Officers, Employees and Servants of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Designated "John and Jane Doe Numbered: 1 Through 5," Jointly and Severally, All Such Being Employees of the Drug Enforcement Administration.
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
25 F.3d 98 Eusebio BERNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. Eusebio BERNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James CLIFFORD, Brian Fitzpatrick, a certain Unidentified Confidential Informant, and Unidentified Agents, Officers, Employees and Servants of the Drug Enforcement Administration, designated "John and Jane Doe numbered: 1 through 5," jointly and severally, all such defendants being employees of the Drug Enforcement Administration. Defendants-Appellees. No. 1281, Docket 93-6283. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued March 14, 1994. Decided May 25, 1994. William Noland, New York City, of counsel, for Eusebio Bernard. Judith L. Mogul, U.S. Attorney's Office, S.D. of N.Y., New York City, of counsel, for U.S. Before: WALKER, McLAUGHLIN, and RONEY, * Circuit Judges. RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge: 1 Plaintiff challenges the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States and a number of federal employees in this action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). He alleged he was wrongly …
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.